UCHastings Spotlight

          Student Organizations at UC Hastings

          With over sixty registered student organizations on campus, there are many great ways to pursue your interests and get involved. Whatever your interest is, or your passion: You can do it at UC Hastings.

          Legally Speaking

          In conversation with UC Hastings Professor Joan C. Williams.

          UC Hastings Professor Joan Williams welcomes U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a conversation that touches on a broad range of subjects, from opera to marriage to work/life balance, doctrinal questions, and cases from the 1970's to present, including the court's role in establishing individual rights and equal protection. 

          Life @UCHastings

          "Look at the view I get every morning."

          "This is my school. These are my friends." Video by Fatemeh Shahangia '12.
          Monday, June 17, 2013

          Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

          Sample alt tag.
          Rory Little, Professor of Law.

          Justice Alito’s dissent today in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.

          In Apprendi v. New Jersey (1996), the Supreme Court held that facts increasing a criminal defendant’s maximum possible sentence are elements of the criminal offense that must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. But in 2002, the Court decided in Harris v. United States that Apprendi did not apply to facts that would increase a defendant’s mandatory minimum sentence. Today’s decision overrules Harris and holds that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find all facts that fix the penalty range of a crime.

          In The Lost History of Apprendi and the Blakely Petition for Rehearing, Professor Little noted that Apprendi was based “on an erroneous historical un­derstanding of the Framers’ views in 1790 when they wrote the 6th Amendment’s jury-trial guarantee.” Relying on this piece in his dissent today, Justice Alito suggests that if the Court is of a mind to reconsider existing precedent, it should reconsider Apprendi.


          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Monday, October 24, 2016

          UC Hastings Professors Witness History in Bogota, Colombia

          As the world was focused on Colombia, UC Hastings Professors Naomi Roht-Arriaza and Richard Marcus were there to witness history.
          Friday, October 21, 2016

          Innovative gift from tech startup accelerator Hackers/Founders supports UC Hastings Startup Legal Garage

          "Being able to face these issues with a law school that's doing cutting-edge work is invaluable.” - Hackers/Founders CEO Jonathan Nelson
          Tuesday, October 18, 2016

          Tenderloin Community Benefit District Appoints UC Hastings 3L to Board of Directors

          Improving the sidewalks means more than cleaning services, says 3L Peter Stevens, tenants rights advocate and proud Tenderloin resident.
          Monday, October 10, 2016

          2L Briana Desch spearheads new Tenderloin Community Outreach Board for ASUCH

          Student task force dedicated to establishing relationships with the Tenderloin community.
          Monday, October 10, 2016

          Manuel v. City of Joliet: Don’t forget “unreasonable” in the Fourth Amendment

          Analysis by Professor Rory Little
          Go to News Archive