Friday, February 14, 2014

          Patent Trolling: Why Bio & Pharmaceuticals Are at Risk

          Groundbreaking study by Professor Robin Feldman and Harvard Fellow Dr. Nicholson Price show conventional wisdom is wrong when it comes to patent trolls, bio and pharma.
          Sample alt tag.
          Robin Feldman, Professor of Law and Director, Institute for Innovation Law

          Conventional wisdom holds that bio and pharma are safe from patent trolls. In a ground-breaking study, Professor Robin Feldman and Harvard Fellow Dr. Nicholson Price show that the conventional wisdom is wrong.

          The study is available for download via SSRN: Patent Trolling: Why Bio & Pharmaceuticals Are at Risk. Highlights include:

          • With the Association of University Technology Managers revisiting its policy against selling to NPEs, the authors considered whether universities could provide an extensive pool of ammunition for NPEs to launch against current products.
          • To supplement increasing anecdotal evidence that patent trolling is moving into bio and pharma, the authors examined the life science holdings of five major universities.We skimmed the patent holdings for four of the of five university systems with the highest number of patents issued in fiscal year 2011: the University of California system, the University of Texas system, MIT, and CalTech. We added as a wild-card the University of South Florida, the school among the top 10 in 2011 patent grants which had the lowest ratio of license revenues to research expenditures. 
          • The study identified dozens of patents that could be deployed against current bio and pharm industries, following the patterns that NPEs have used against other industries. These include patents on drug formulas, methods of treatments, research methods, dosage forms, and others.
          • In deciding whether to undertake the study, the authors agonized over whether the potential for harm outweighed the potential benefit. After all, if reform efforts are not undertaken, the work could simply provide a handy road map for those who would follow.
          • Life sciences trolling is predictable and in its infancy, however. The study is intended to sound a warning bell.

          About the Instititute for Innovation Law at UC Hastings

          The Institute for Innovation Law (Institute) is a public interest academic center at UC Hastings. The Institute engages in academic research and education to encourage innovation through the practice and development of law and policy. The Institute’s mission is to identify and promote the tools, knowledge, and skills needed to encourage innovation through the practice and development of law and policy.

          Media Contact

          Alex A.G. Shapiro
          Director, Communications & Public Affairs
          UC Hastings College of the Law
          Office: (415) 581-8842
          Cell: (415) 813-9214

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Tuesday, October 18, 2016

          Tenderloin Community Benefit District Appoints UC Hastings 3L to Board of Directors

          Improving the sidewalks means more than cleaning services, says 3L Peter Stevens, tenants rights advocate and proud Tenderloin resident.
          Monday, October 10, 2016

          2L Briana Desch spearheads new Tenderloin Community Outreach Board for ASUCH

          Student task force dedicated to establishing relationships with the Tenderloin community.
          Monday, October 10, 2016

          Manuel v. City of Joliet: Don’t forget “unreasonable” in the Fourth Amendment

          Analysis by Professor Rory Little
          Friday, October 07, 2016

          Kevin King ’15 finds his voice arguing before the First District Court of Appeal

          "I came to law school to become a social justice advocate and now I’m armed to build a better tomorrow." - Lawyers for America Fellow Kevin King, Class of 2015
          Wednesday, October 05, 2016

          Thinkers & Doers: September 2016

          FACULTY comment on the Supreme Court, surveillance and privacy, global supply chains, vaccinations, the Dakota Access Pipeline, forensics, the opioid epidemic – ALUMNI run for office, make moves, and use universal appeal of dessert to challenge Islamophobia -- A round-up of new shops, museums, restaurants and bars in the TENDERLOIN, and MORE.
          Go to News Archive