Tuesday, April 17, 2012

UC Hastings Students & Human Rights Commission Highlight Human Impact of “War on Drugs"

More than 100 people attended a public hearing April 12, 2012, on the human impact of the “War on Drugs,” organized with help from UC Hastings College of the Law students Noah Frigault and Azadeh Zohrabi and San Francisco’s Human Rights Commission.

Frigault and Zohrabi spent several months working with the Human Rights Commission as part of an externship with the Social Change Lawyering: Community Group Advocacy Clinic, run by Professor Ascanio Piomelli.

The hearing was designed to put a human face on the community impact of the War on Drugs. Frigault and Zohrabi met with various stakeholders, including San Francisco District Attorney George Gascon and members from the San Francisco Police Department, as well as communities heavily affected by local and national drug enforcement policies.

The Human Rights Commission used the 40th anniversary of the War on Drugs to highlight the impact on those arrested or convicted of minor drug crimes and their communities. The commission has been conducting education and outreach on the discrimination against those with criminal records and the disproportionate impact on the African American and Latino communities.

“People with arrest records or low-level criminal drug convictions are subject to legalized discrimination,” Frigault said. “There are so many disincentives to them re-entering the community, including things that seem cruel, like denial of food stamps, denial of federal education loans, and a one-strike policy for public housing. A whole family can be evicted even they are around someone with a felony conviction.”

Frigault noted that we tend to think of San Francisco as “this progressive colorblind place,” but that “makes it that much easier to these things to happen under the radar.”

The hearing included speakers from various public policy groups and nonprofits, including the NAACP and ACLU of Northern California. Additionally some 25 members of the community spoke during the public comment period. One possible remedy would be to include those with arrest or convictions records as a protected class. That would require approval by the city’s Board of Supervisors.

“This was one of the best experiences I’ve had at UC Hastings,” said Zohrabi. “I was able to go out and work as a lawyer, and talk to the community about their concerns about the war on drugs. It helped me learn how to deal with different stakeholders.”

Zohrabi said she was surprised to learn how complicated various policy issues and public safety concerns were. “It was the first time I was able to talk to law enforcement and get their perspective on it,” she said.

Zohrabi has been working on issues of mass incarceration, and has also worked on ways to minimize solitary confinement.

Piomelli said this is the first time his clinic has partnered with a governmental body. “Usually we work with nonprofits,” he said. “I was attracted to working with the Human Rights Commission, because this class is focused on introducing students to different approaches to social change lawyering.”

The students were supervised by Zoe Polk, a staff attorney with the Human Rights Commission. “I have been quite impressed with her attention to student learning needs, while putting together a first-rate public hearing,” Piomelli said. “It was a wonderful first experience.”

Share this Story

Share via Facebook
Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

Other Recent Stories/ RSS

Friday, June 07, 2013

Viewpoint: Guard Your Clients' Public Secrets

And here's the rub: On his blog, Hunter wrote about his own cases in some detail. He used the real names of clients who were acquitted, and the names of clients for whom he negotiated favorable plea bargains to lesser charges. And he acknowledged that he used the names without his clients' consent.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Viewpoint: The Death Penalty is in Limbo

Our hearts weep for the many victims of Ramirez's cruelty, and that of other perpetrators of vicious crimes. Let us punish these people properly, soundly and economically, by sentencing them to life without parole, and give up on the hollow hopes of a death penalty that is anything but.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Appellate Brief Writing, Before, During and After

No matter how many briefs one has written, the next one can probably be improved because the craft of brief writing is a search for perfection. But unlike perfection, if a few basic strategies are followed, more effective briefs are easily within reach.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Writing a Brief--Lessons From Literature

Tell the truth — lay out all of the facts, and all of the law — but tell it slant. Be artful in word choice, for every detail counts. Consider at the outset even small choices like what to name the parties — are they plaintiff and defendant, victim and prisoner, or Mr. Smith and Officer Jones? Judiciously use the passive voice to subtly downplay the negative, while preferring active voice generally, and especially in order to accentuate the positive.
Monday, June 17, 2013

Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

Justice Alito’s dissent in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.
Go to News Archive