UCHastings Instagram

          Late night #runningmanchallenge in the @hastingslawjournal office! #repost #UCHastings #finals
          Instagram Photo Likes unsocialcharisma, runningmanchallenge2016, alexagshapiro and 30 others like this.

          UCHastings Spotlight

          At the heartbeat of technology industry & Silicon Valley

          Students in the Startup Legal Garage provide corporate and intellectual property work to early stage startup companies under the supervision of leading attorneys throughout the Bay Area.

          Legally Speaking

          In conversation with UC Hastings Professor Joan C. Williams.

          UC Hastings Professor Joan Williams welcomes U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a conversation that touches on a broad range of subjects, from opera to marriage to work/life balance, doctrinal questions, and cases from the 1970's to present, including the court's role in establishing individual rights and equal protection. 

          Life @UCHastings

          "Look at the view I get every morning."

          "This is my school. These are my friends." Video by Fatemeh Shahangia '12.
          Monday, June 17, 2013

          Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

          Sample alt tag.
          Rory Little, Professor of Law.

          Justice Alito’s dissent today in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.

          In Apprendi v. New Jersey (1996), the Supreme Court held that facts increasing a criminal defendant’s maximum possible sentence are elements of the criminal offense that must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. But in 2002, the Court decided in Harris v. United States that Apprendi did not apply to facts that would increase a defendant’s mandatory minimum sentence. Today’s decision overrules Harris and holds that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find all facts that fix the penalty range of a crime.

          In The Lost History of Apprendi and the Blakely Petition for Rehearing, Professor Little noted that Apprendi was based “on an erroneous historical un­derstanding of the Framers’ views in 1790 when they wrote the 6th Amendment’s jury-trial guarantee.” Relying on this piece in his dissent today, Justice Alito suggests that if the Court is of a mind to reconsider existing precedent, it should reconsider Apprendi.

          ###

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Friday, April 29, 2016

          Thinkers & Doers: April 2016

          UC Hastings community members in the news and making moves.
          Wednesday, April 27, 2016

          Building UC Hastings: Brick by Brick

          New academic building and student housing in partnership with UCSF will re-energize the campus community.
          Friday, April 22, 2016

          Judge Nancy Gertner to Keynote 135th UC Hastings Law Commencement

          Former U.S. federal judge built her career around standing up for women’s rights, civil liberties and justice for all.
          Thursday, April 07, 2016

          The Entertainment Law Vanguard

          With their top lawyering skills and in-depth understanding of how technology is changing the media landscape, alumni are breaking new ground in entertainment law.
          Monday, April 04, 2016

          A Conversation with Supreme Court of California Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar

          2L Daniel Morales reflects on Justice Cuéllar's inspiring visit.
          Go to News Archive