UCHastings Instagram

Student-Alumni #BOB
Instagram Photo Likes chesc2015, cristalergy, liannemarcella and 24 others like this.
Monday, March 11, 2013

Depoorter on "The Upside of Losing"

From the Abstract of "The Upside of Losing," forthcoming from Columbia Law Review:

Conventional understanding in law-reform communities is that time and resources are best directed toward legal disputes that have the highest chance of success and that litigation is to be avoided if it is likely to establish or strengthen unfavorable precedent. Contrary to this accepted wisdom, this Essay analyzes the strategic decisions of litigation entrepreneurs who pursue litigation with the awareness that losing the case can provide substantial benefits. Unfavorable litigation outcomes can be uniquely salient and powerful in highlighting the misfortunes of individuals under prevailing law, while presenting a broader narrative about the current failure of the legal status quo. The resulting public backlash may slow down legislative trends and can even prompt legislative initiatives that reverse the unfavorable judicial decisions or induce broader reform.

This analysis revises some conventional wisdom about litigation. First, while it is traditionally understood that legal reform activists must persuade courts to recognize unattended rights or to confirm new rights and activist positions, the analysis here suggests that social changes can be obtained in litigation without requiring the involvement of courts as policymakers. Moreover, passive courts and judicial deference in fact strengthen the mobilizing effect of litigation by clearly shifting the burden to legislators and their constituents. Second, the dynamics of successful defeat in litigation shed new light on the costs and benefits involved with litigation. In the proposed framework, a plaintiff’s decision to litigate rests not simply on the probability of success but also on a tradeoff between the potential costs of a negative precedent and the political benefits obtained in defeat. Third, the mobilizing potential of adverse court decisions presents a fascinating conflict between the immediate interests of the actual plaintiff and of the litigation entrepreneur or intermediary that supports the litigation with an eye on the underlying long-term goals of a social cause. Finally, the potential benefits of adverse outcomes refute some of the criticisms about the limitations and downsides of pursuing social change through courts.

Depoorter also recently published “Copyright Fee Shifting: A Proposal to Promote Fair Use and Fair Licensing” in the California Law Review.
Go to News Archive

Share this Story

Share via Facebook
Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

Other Recent Stories/ RSS

Monday, March 02, 2015

National Cultural Heritage Moot Court Championship!

Team members Katherine Green '16, Nathaniel Ku '16 and Andrea Tool '16 triumphed by arguing two rounds on Friday and four rounds on Saturday to become the National Champions. Writeup by Assistant Dean Toni Young '76.
Monday, March 02, 2015

Professor Purcell Shares Mediation Expertise at Indian Conference

In India, mediation is a bright spot in an overwhelmed court system.
Saturday, February 28, 2015

4 Things I Learned From Justice Cuéllar

2L Anthony Rodriguez reflects on California Supreme Court Justice Tino Cuéllar's visit to UC Hastings.
Friday, February 27, 2015

Chancellor & Dean Emerita Mary Kay Kane Elected to Board of IALS

The International Association of Law Schools was founded in 2005 at the behest of legal educators who recognized the growing inter-relationship of norms from transnational legal systems.
Friday, February 27, 2015

Thinkers & Doers: February 27, 2015

UC Hastings community members in the news and making moves February 21, 2015 - February 27, 2015.
Go to News Archive