UCHastings Spotlight

          At the heartbeat of technology industry & Silicon Valley

          Students in the Startup Legal Garage provide corporate and intellectual property work to early stage startup companies under the supervision of leading attorneys throughout the Bay Area.

          Life @UCHastings

          "I drink a lot of coffee."

          "This is a video I made that basically condensed my first year into three minutes. I hope you enjoy it!" Video by Jennifer Bautista '12. 

          Legally Speaking

          In conversation with UC Hastings Professor Joan C. Williams.

          UC Hastings Professor Joan Williams welcomes U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a conversation that touches on a broad range of subjects, from opera to marriage to work/life balance, doctrinal questions, and cases from the 1970's to present, including the court's role in establishing individual rights and equal protection. 
          Thursday, June 20, 2013

          Patent Troll Expert Robin Feldman Available for Comment after FTC Chairwoman Ramirez Calls For Investigation

          San Francisco, CA – Professor Robin Feldman, Director of the UC Hastings Institute for Innovation Law, today welcomed FTC Chairwoman Ramirez’s speech stressing the need for FTC hearings on a broad-ranging investigation into patent trolling, calling it “precisely what is needed.”

          FTC Chairwoman Ramirez’s speech extensively cited data from Professor Robin Feldman’s research at the UCHastings Institute for Innovation Law, as did the recent White House Report on Patent Assertion.

          Professor Robin Feldman's work is widely regarded as some of the most influential scholarship in the field of patent law. Her landmark study "The America Invents Act 500 Expanded: Effects of Patent Monetization Entities on US Litigation”, conducted at the UC Hastings Institute for Innovation Law, has ignited debate and further investigation by both the White House and the FTC on the definition of patent assertion entities – firms with a business model focused primarily on purchasing and asserting patents. The definition of a patent assertion entity has been hotly debated.

          "Whale's tail" graph showing the percentage of lawsuits by patent monetization entities climbing in recent years. (now a majority and reaching almost 60% in 2012).

          Chart of the top 10 most

          Chart of the top 10 most "frequent flyers" that is, those who have filed the greatest number of patent lawsuits since 2007. All 10 are patent monetization entities. Not a single one makes products.

          Professor Feldman has written and researched extensively on patent assertion including:

          • The America Invents Act 500 Expanded: Effects of Patent Monetization Entities, forthcoming UCLA J. L. & Tech. 2013, with Tom Ewing & Sara Jeruss (expanding the earlier study to include 13,000 patent lawsuits involving 30,000 patent assertions documenting that as of 2012, a majority of patent lawsuits (almost 60%) are now filed by those who assert patents, rather than making products).
          • The America Invents Act 500: Effects of Patent Monetization Entities on US Litigation, 11 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 357 (2012), with Sara Jeruss & Joshua Walker, (flowing from work for the GAO mandated by Congress and concluding that the percentage of patent lawsuits filed by monetization entities has risen dramatically from 2007-2011); http://dltr.law.duke.edu/2012/11/30/the-america-invents-act-500-effects-of-patent-monetization-entities-on-us-litigation/
          • Rethinking Patent Rights (Harvard 2012) (analyzing modern patent bargaining);
          • The Giants Among Us, 2012 Stanford Tech. L. Rev. 1, with Tom Ewing (discussing the antitrust implications of mass aggregators and describing 1,300 subsidiaries of the largest and most secretive aggregator). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1923449
          • Intellectual Property Wrongs (forthcoming 2013, Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2127558 (including 30 pages of examples of troubling behavior in intellectual property assertion. Pages 70-78 of the article also set out how an FTC Section 6(b) investigation might be structured.)

          About the Institute for Innovation Law

          The UCHastings Institute for Innovation Law is dedicated to promoting Data-Driven Law-Making, allowing courts, legislators, and regulators to make informed decisions using reliable and objective analysis. Focusing on Innovation, the Institute provides a trusted source of high-quality, substantive academic research that will help create the tools and knowledge necessary to cultivate a culture of innovation. The Institute also has several substantive programs under its umbrella, including the Privacy + Technology Project; the Law & Bioscience Project, and the Startup Clinics—in which students help with legal work for early stage technology and bioscience companies under the pro bono supervision of attorneys at major law firms. With 10 faculty members, The Institute is directed by Professor Robin Feldman.

          Media Contact:

          Alex A.G. Shapiro
          Director, Communications & Public Affairs
          UC Hastings College of the Law
          Office: (415) 581-8842
          Cell: (415) 813-9214
          Email: shapiroa@uchastings.edu

          Institute for Innovation Law Logo

          ###

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Wednesday, June 22, 2016

          UC Hastings Students Honored For Their Work in the Public Interest

          Establishment of New Fund Dedicated to Advancing Social Justice Work at UC Hastings
          Wednesday, June 22, 2016

          UC Hastings Entering Public Safety Partnership with UCSF Police Department

          Expanding police and support services for safety and security of campus, neighborhood.
          Tuesday, June 21, 2016

          Expensive Medicine: Prof. Robin Feldman’s Senate Testimony on the CREATES Act

          “An important safety program is being hijacked to block competition.”
          Monday, June 06, 2016

          Thinkers & Doers: May 2016

          UC Hastings community members in the news and making moves.
          Friday, May 27, 2016

          Prof. Veena Dubal's Objection on behalf of Uber Drivers featured in LA Times

          "When lawyer Veena Dubal heard last month that Uber drivers seeking to be recognized as employees rather than independent contractors might settle their class-action lawsuit before it went to trial, she cried."
          Go to News Archive