Tuesday, January 03, 2012

UC Hastings Team Sweeps Tang Moot Court National Championship

In a Hastings vs. Hastings final round of the Thomas Tang National Moot Court Competition, UC Hastings students Elaine Kuo ’13 and Erin Pham ’13 won first place. The National Championship was held in Atlanta, Ga., in conjunction with the annual NAPABA Convention. Erin also won the award for Second Place Oral Advocate. The UC Hastings team of Joanna Lee ’13 and Henry Truong ’13 won the National Second Place Award. Congratulations to the teams for capturing the top honors at this prestigious national championship!

The Thomas Tang Moot Court Competition is administered by the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association. The competition honors the late Judge Thomas Tang, a champion of individual rights and an advocate for the advancement of minority attorneys. The competition is open to all students, but is especially designed to reach out to APA law students and provide them with an opportunity to showcase their writing and oral advocacy skills and compete for scholarships.

The UC Hastings Moot Court Department extends special thanks to student coaches Ivy Paek, Matt Tabo and Susan Tran, and to alumni coaches Michelle Law, Kyong Kim, Teri Nguyen and Kathy Dong.

Please stay tuned to www.hastingsmootcourt.com for judging opportunities to help our spring UC Hastings teams win awards and championships next year! You may also contact Toni Young, director of the Moot Court Department, at younga@uchastings.edu to hear about other ways you or your firm can continue to support the strong tradition of Moot Court success at UC Hastings.

Share this Story

Share via Facebook
Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

Other Recent Stories/ RSS

Monday, June 17, 2013

Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

Justice Alito’s dissent in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.
Friday, June 07, 2013

Viewpoint: Guard Your Clients' Public Secrets

And here's the rub: On his blog, Hunter wrote about his own cases in some detail. He used the real names of clients who were acquitted, and the names of clients for whom he negotiated favorable plea bargains to lesser charges. And he acknowledged that he used the names without his clients' consent.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Viewpoint: The Death Penalty is in Limbo

Our hearts weep for the many victims of Ramirez's cruelty, and that of other perpetrators of vicious crimes. Let us punish these people properly, soundly and economically, by sentencing them to life without parole, and give up on the hollow hopes of a death penalty that is anything but.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Appellate Brief Writing, Before, During and After

No matter how many briefs one has written, the next one can probably be improved because the craft of brief writing is a search for perfection. But unlike perfection, if a few basic strategies are followed, more effective briefs are easily within reach.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Writing a Brief--Lessons From Literature

Tell the truth — lay out all of the facts, and all of the law — but tell it slant. Be artful in word choice, for every detail counts. Consider at the outset even small choices like what to name the parties — are they plaintiff and defendant, victim and prisoner, or Mr. Smith and Officer Jones? Judiciously use the passive voice to subtly downplay the negative, while preferring active voice generally, and especially in order to accentuate the positive.
Go to News Archive