Thursday, January 26, 2012

Center for WorkLife Law Receives Rockefeller Family Fund Grant Money

The Center for WorkLife Law welcomed in the New Year with the receipt of a $50,000 grant from the Rockefeller Family Fund in New York, NY.

The grant is a continuation—the fifth in a series—of general operating funds in support of the Center. It was approved by the Rockefeller Family Fund’s trustees in late 2011.

“This grant is to support our work on family responsibilities discrimination,” says Distinguished Professor of Law Joan C. Williams. Williams is also the founding director of the Center for WorkLife Law and is the Hastings Foundation chair.

“This kind of discrimination, which the Center for WorkLife Law put on the map, has now been shown to be the strongest form of gender bias: mothers are 79 percent less likely to be hired and 100 percent less likely to be promoted than identical women without children, according to a leading study by Shelley Correll and co-authors,” Williams says.

“Support from the Rockefeller Family Fund has enabled WorkLife Law to continue to work with employment lawyers (both plaintiffs and defense), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, and public policymakers in California to eliminate discrimination against mothers and other adults with family caregiving responsibilities.”

The Rockefeller Family Fund (RFF) works at the cutting edge of advocacy in such areas as environmental protection, advancing the economic rights of women, and helping citizens hold public and private institutions accountable for their actions. The Fund distributes grants in four program areas, including Economic Justice for Women.

Economic Justice for Women grants support opportunities to promote economic justice. In particular, the program seeks to provide women with equitable employment opportunities and to improve their work lives. The Center for WorkLife Law has been supported by RFF since 2006.

Share this Story

Share via Facebook
Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

Other Recent Stories/ RSS

Monday, June 17, 2013

Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

Justice Alito’s dissent in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.
Friday, June 07, 2013

Viewpoint: Guard Your Clients' Public Secrets

And here's the rub: On his blog, Hunter wrote about his own cases in some detail. He used the real names of clients who were acquitted, and the names of clients for whom he negotiated favorable plea bargains to lesser charges. And he acknowledged that he used the names without his clients' consent.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Viewpoint: The Death Penalty is in Limbo

Our hearts weep for the many victims of Ramirez's cruelty, and that of other perpetrators of vicious crimes. Let us punish these people properly, soundly and economically, by sentencing them to life without parole, and give up on the hollow hopes of a death penalty that is anything but.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Appellate Brief Writing, Before, During and After

No matter how many briefs one has written, the next one can probably be improved because the craft of brief writing is a search for perfection. But unlike perfection, if a few basic strategies are followed, more effective briefs are easily within reach.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Writing a Brief--Lessons From Literature

Tell the truth — lay out all of the facts, and all of the law — but tell it slant. Be artful in word choice, for every detail counts. Consider at the outset even small choices like what to name the parties — are they plaintiff and defendant, victim and prisoner, or Mr. Smith and Officer Jones? Judiciously use the passive voice to subtly downplay the negative, while preferring active voice generally, and especially in order to accentuate the positive.
Go to News Archive