UCHastings Instagram

          The 134th UC Hastings College of the Law commencement is coming up fast! #Scrolls #UCHastings2015
          Instagram Photo Likes temnee, aoverhouse, heywheresgina and 34 others like this.
          Thursday, February 20, 2014

          Moot Court: Bringing Home the Heavy Hardware

          The teams, dubbed “Advocacy Machines” by one judge, are in the midst of another hot season.
          Sample alt tag.
          “UC Hastings Moot Court had a great start to the 2013-14 season!” says David Chang '13, Moot Court Board Co-Chair, pictured with California Supreme Court Associate Justice Marvin Baxter '66.

          UC Hastings’ top-ranked Moot Court team is in the midst of another sizzling season, racking up trophies across the country.

          Byron Huang ’14 and Joy Siu ’15 took home the National Championship at the Thomas Tang Moot Court Competition in Kansas City on Nov. 9, 2013. According to The Mootster, the team dominated by “barbecuing the competition and impressing the judges” through five rounds of oral argument. Joy and Byron also took home the award for the Best Brief in the nation.

          This year’s Thomas Tang teams had incredible bench strength. UC Hastings sent three teams to compete in the Tang’s Regional Rounds, in San Francisco and Seattle, who stunned the crowd with “their creative arguments and calm demeanors.” At the Regional Competition, Hastings’ Tang teams won the Regional Championship in San Francisco and Best Brief awards in both San Francisco and Seattle. Look for additional details in the upcoming issue of The Mootster.

          Nationals, and National Exposure

          Sponsored by the New York Bar Association, the National Moot Court Tournament is one of the oldest and most prestigious appellate advocacy competitions in the nation. For the first time in four years, UC Hastings qualified for the National Rounds of the competition in New York City by winning the Regional Tournament in November.

          These recent wins come during a heady season for the Nationals team. U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. offered tips and tactics to the team as it prepared for the National competition during a daylong visit to Hastings on Jan. 29.

          Solicitor General Verrilli served as a distinguished guest judge at one of the final team practices for Michael LaFond ‘14, Nicholas Yu ’14, and Sean Juarez ‘14. Verrilli’s feedback contributed to the team’s finish as National Quarterfinalists at the New York National Final Rounds, one of the top eight of 139 teams in the country.

          Specialty Competitions

          Some Moot Court competitions are organized around a particular area of law. UC Hastings excelled at this year’s National Entertainment Law Moot Court Competition at Pepperdine. Brett Corbett ’14 and Greg Michael ’15 won the National Best Brief Award, and finished the competition as National Finalists. Brett was named Best Oral Advocate in the Final Round.

          Teams focus on groundbreaking legal issues. At the John Marshall Law School’s International Moot Court Competition in IT & Privacy law, this year’s competition dealt with Google Glass. Matt Lusich ’15, Paige Pembrook ’15 and Barbara Tolbert ’15 received some of the highest scores in the preliminary and final rounds. One judge described the UC Hastings representatives as “advocacy machines.”

          At the Whittier National Juvenile Law Competition, the team of Lauren Coleman ’15 and Jonathan Myers ’15 finished as National Semifinalists. Soha Jafarzade ’15 and Leah Kaufman ’15 finished as National Quarterfinalists.

          Out of the Classroom, Into the World

          The Hastings Appellate Project is entering its fifth year with a new slate of pro bono representation at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Allison Harms ’14 and David Chang ’14 are representing a Chinese refugee whose wife was subjected to multiple forced abortions. Allison and David will be arguing before the 9th Circuit on March 14. Patrick Burns ’14 and Jamie Cheng ’14 are representing a Chinese labor protester appealing the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of asylum. Patrick and Jamie will argue before the 9th Circuit in April. Reilly Stoler ’14 and Helen Luu ’14 represent a lawful permanent resident subject to removal for a misdemeanor. Helen and Reilly will also be arguing before the 9th Circuit in April.

          Great Start to the Season

          “UC Hastings Moot Court had a great start to the 2013-14 season!” said Chang, Moot Court Board Co-Chair. “Our team members’ hard work and commitment to making every practice count translated into significant hardware for Hastings. Special thanks to all of the faculty, alumni, and Moot Court Board members who contributed to our team’s early season success!”

          Read more about the season here.

          ###

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Tuesday, April 21, 2015

          Outstanding: Results from the 2015 Student Giving Campaign

          Campus groups benefit from matched donations of $9,000.
          Tuesday, April 21, 2015

          Justin Buell '09 Finds Truth in Photography

          Following his passion after running a successful political consulting firm.
          Monday, April 20, 2015

          3Ls Crowned National Champions at Prince Evidence Moot Court Competition

          It's the second win in three years for the moot court.
          Friday, April 17, 2015

          3Ls Hayley Reynolds & Daniel Zarchy Win at Ninth Circuit

          Case presents novel issue of whether witness tampering is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude for purposes of federal immigration proceedings, writes Stephen Tollafield, Professor & Associate Director, Legal Writing & Moot Court Department.
          Thursday, April 16, 2015

          HAP Students Argue Police Evasion Case at Ninth Circuit

          3Ls Gregory Michael and Dorothy Yamamoto argued their pro bono case, Medina Nunez v. Holder.
          Go to News Archive