Thursday, April 12, 2012

New Innovation Law Clinics at UC Hastings

This fall marks the formal debut of four new Innovation Law Clinics, designed to give UC Hastings students direct transactional and intellectual property experience in a real-world context, and just maybe find the next new thing.

“Our students are working with very young, early-stage entrepreneurs,” said Professor Robin Feldman, director of the LAB Project. “Imagine grad students with a dream for a new computer, or a new drug delivery system. They each believe they have the next greatest idea.”

Two clinics soft-launched as pilot projects this year. Nine students working with the UC Hastings LAB Project, the UCSF technology transfer office, and the “Startup in a Box” program with the California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3) helped budding biotech innovators develop their ideas and trouble-shoot legal issues.

Two additional clinics, focused on technology startups, small businesses and social enterprises, come online in Fall 2012. Each is yearlong, and open to 3Ls. By using outside attorneys from local technology law firms, Hastings will be able to offer clinic slots to 50 to 60 students over time, and still meet supervision guidelines.

Traditional legal education focuses on case law and litigation. But some 40% of law is transactional. “These clinics provide relevant, practical experience, with a classroom component for reflection,” Feldman said.

As with all clinics, students begin with a practicum, learning the underlying doctrines of a transactional practice. UC Hastings students are then paired with business students and innovators from UC Berkeley, UCSF and UC Santa Cruz. Working with inventors and innovators give UC Hastings students a chance to see firsthand how entrepreneurs think and work. Then, in their seminars, they can analyze and brainstorm problems with peers.

In fast-moving sectors, such as biotech, knowledge of the field is vital. Bioscience law, in particular, “is being made on the ground. It’s not in dusty casebooks,” Feldman said.

The start-up focus is natural for UC Hastings, given its proximity to Silicon Valley. “One of the things California does well is innovation,” said Feldman. “And innovation is a key driver of the American economy.”

The program will serve ventures too small or too young to afford traditional legal services. The clinics will also meet the needs of local businesses, including mom-and-pop stores in the Tenderloin. The social enterprise clinic will focus on business that are “doing well by doing good,” such as Tom's shoes, a for-profit that has a companion non-profit that donates a pair of shoes for each pair sold.

California lawmakers recently approved a new corporate form known as a benefit corporation. This means UC Hastings students will be some of the first graduates with practical knowledge about the new structure.

In the clinics, students will help entrepreneurs and small business owners with entity formation, supply contracts, employment contracts, and help spot IP issues.

The problem-solving approach is much more like a traditional business-school approach, Feldman said. And the clinics have attracted students that are very much like the entrepreneurs they work with. “These are excited, engaged, energetic self-starters,” Feldman said of her students. “They are the type of students who want to go out and make something happen.”

The result, she hopes, will be young lawyers are not just business-focused, but think like entrepreneurs think, she said. “We want to teach our students to be partners in enterprise, not just the lawyer in the room.”

Related Links:

Share this Story

Share via Facebook
Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

Other Recent Stories/ RSS

Friday, June 07, 2013

Viewpoint: Guard Your Clients' Public Secrets

And here's the rub: On his blog, Hunter wrote about his own cases in some detail. He used the real names of clients who were acquitted, and the names of clients for whom he negotiated favorable plea bargains to lesser charges. And he acknowledged that he used the names without his clients' consent.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Viewpoint: The Death Penalty is in Limbo

Our hearts weep for the many victims of Ramirez's cruelty, and that of other perpetrators of vicious crimes. Let us punish these people properly, soundly and economically, by sentencing them to life without parole, and give up on the hollow hopes of a death penalty that is anything but.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Appellate Brief Writing, Before, During and After

No matter how many briefs one has written, the next one can probably be improved because the craft of brief writing is a search for perfection. But unlike perfection, if a few basic strategies are followed, more effective briefs are easily within reach.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Writing a Brief--Lessons From Literature

Tell the truth — lay out all of the facts, and all of the law — but tell it slant. Be artful in word choice, for every detail counts. Consider at the outset even small choices like what to name the parties — are they plaintiff and defendant, victim and prisoner, or Mr. Smith and Officer Jones? Judiciously use the passive voice to subtly downplay the negative, while preferring active voice generally, and especially in order to accentuate the positive.
Monday, June 17, 2013

Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

Justice Alito’s dissent in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.
Go to News Archive