Friday, May 11, 2012

UC Hastings to Survey Language Access to Courts

UC Hastings College of the Law is helping the state Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) identify creative ways California courts respond to the challenge of serving court users whose proficiency in English is limited.

The AOC retained UC Hastings as a consultant on the project after the AOC received a $35,000 grant from the State Justice Institute to survey best practices for serving court users with limited English proficiency. The study’s goal is to highlight and replicate successful programs.

Professor David Jung and Noemi Gallardo ’12, who has a master’s degree in public policy and worked as a certified court interpreter before attending UC Hastings, head up the study for UC Hastings. Jung and Gallardo worked together last year to write “A Local Official’s Guide to Language Access Laws,” published by the League of California Cities Institute for Local Government and UC Hastings’ Public Law Research Institute.

They have assembled a team of 10 UC Hastings students and recent graduates to conduct the survey. “It’s a unique opportunity for our students to think about how courts serve the public,” Jung said. “UC Hastings’ location and popular externship programs give our students unparalleled exposure to the courts. Participating in this study will give them the civilian’s perspective, helping them understand the many ways in which courts provide services essential to people’s lives.”

California is one of the nation’s most linguistically diverse states. By some counts, nearly 170 languages are spoken in California. In Los Angeles County alone, more than half of residents speak a language other than English at home, according to 2010 U.S. Census data.

Jung noted that UC Hastings’ diverse student body is one of the reasons UC Hastings is the right partner for this project. “When we had our first meeting with the 10 students, we had 14 languages in the room,” Jung said. “That gives you an idea of our diversity.”

This is the first project funded under the Master Agreement for Research Collaboration UC Hastings and the Administrative Office of the Courts entered last year.

Share this Story

Share via Facebook
Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

Other Recent Stories/ RSS

Friday, June 07, 2013

Viewpoint: Guard Your Clients' Public Secrets

And here's the rub: On his blog, Hunter wrote about his own cases in some detail. He used the real names of clients who were acquitted, and the names of clients for whom he negotiated favorable plea bargains to lesser charges. And he acknowledged that he used the names without his clients' consent.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Viewpoint: The Death Penalty is in Limbo

Our hearts weep for the many victims of Ramirez's cruelty, and that of other perpetrators of vicious crimes. Let us punish these people properly, soundly and economically, by sentencing them to life without parole, and give up on the hollow hopes of a death penalty that is anything but.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Appellate Brief Writing, Before, During and After

No matter how many briefs one has written, the next one can probably be improved because the craft of brief writing is a search for perfection. But unlike perfection, if a few basic strategies are followed, more effective briefs are easily within reach.
Friday, June 14, 2013

Your Skills: Writing a Brief--Lessons From Literature

Tell the truth — lay out all of the facts, and all of the law — but tell it slant. Be artful in word choice, for every detail counts. Consider at the outset even small choices like what to name the parties — are they plaintiff and defendant, victim and prisoner, or Mr. Smith and Officer Jones? Judiciously use the passive voice to subtly downplay the negative, while preferring active voice generally, and especially in order to accentuate the positive.
Monday, June 17, 2013

Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

Justice Alito’s dissent in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.
Go to News Archive