UCHastings Instagram

          Student-Alumni #BOB
          Instagram Photo Likes chesc2015, uchastings_blsa, liannemarcella and 25 others like this.
          Monday, March 11, 2013

          Depoorter on "The Upside of Losing"

          From the Abstract of "The Upside of Losing," forthcoming from Columbia Law Review:

          Conventional understanding in law-reform communities is that time and resources are best directed toward legal disputes that have the highest chance of success and that litigation is to be avoided if it is likely to establish or strengthen unfavorable precedent. Contrary to this accepted wisdom, this Essay analyzes the strategic decisions of litigation entrepreneurs who pursue litigation with the awareness that losing the case can provide substantial benefits. Unfavorable litigation outcomes can be uniquely salient and powerful in highlighting the misfortunes of individuals under prevailing law, while presenting a broader narrative about the current failure of the legal status quo. The resulting public backlash may slow down legislative trends and can even prompt legislative initiatives that reverse the unfavorable judicial decisions or induce broader reform.

          This analysis revises some conventional wisdom about litigation. First, while it is traditionally understood that legal reform activists must persuade courts to recognize unattended rights or to confirm new rights and activist positions, the analysis here suggests that social changes can be obtained in litigation without requiring the involvement of courts as policymakers. Moreover, passive courts and judicial deference in fact strengthen the mobilizing effect of litigation by clearly shifting the burden to legislators and their constituents. Second, the dynamics of successful defeat in litigation shed new light on the costs and benefits involved with litigation. In the proposed framework, a plaintiff’s decision to litigate rests not simply on the probability of success but also on a tradeoff between the potential costs of a negative precedent and the political benefits obtained in defeat. Third, the mobilizing potential of adverse court decisions presents a fascinating conflict between the immediate interests of the actual plaintiff and of the litigation entrepreneur or intermediary that supports the litigation with an eye on the underlying long-term goals of a social cause. Finally, the potential benefits of adverse outcomes refute some of the criticisms about the limitations and downsides of pursuing social change through courts.

          Depoorter also recently published “Copyright Fee Shifting: A Proposal to Promote Fair Use and Fair Licensing” in the California Law Review.
          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Friday, March 27, 2015

          Thinkers & Doers: March 27, 2015

          UC Hastings community members in the news and making moves March 22, 2015 - March 27, 2015.
          Tuesday, March 24, 2015

          Q + A with Court Mediator Mattie Robertson '10

          How the UC Hastings Mediation Clinic prepared her to manage the Court Mediation Program for the nonprofit SEEDS Community Resolution Center in Oakland.
          Tuesday, March 24, 2015

          Sara Huffman ‘14 Selected as Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by PG&E and Latham & Watkins

          Grant supports expanding legal services to senior patients at the Veteran’s Administration hospital.
          Monday, March 23, 2015

          George Takei to Keynote 134th UC Hastings Law Commencement

          Sunday, May 10, 2015 in the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium
          Monday, March 23, 2015

          Panel Discussion on "The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg" by Scott Dodson

          Professor Scott Dodson is the editor of a new book about the Supreme Court justice and her 50 years influencing the law.
          Go to News Archive