UCHastings Spotlight

          The perfect opportunity.

          “I came to UC Hastings so I could learn to serve my community and the LfA Fellowship provided that learning opportunity for me--while also helping to fill the justice gap." Saron Tesfai '14 

          Legally Speaking

          In conversation with UC Hastings Professor Joan C. Williams.

          UC Hastings Professor Joan Williams welcomes U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a conversation that touches on a broad range of subjects, from opera to marriage to work/life balance, doctrinal questions, and cases from the 1970's to present, including the court's role in establishing individual rights and equal protection. 

          Life @UCHastings

          "Look at the view I get every morning."

          "This is my school. These are my friends." Video by Fatemeh Shahangia '12.
          Monday, June 17, 2013

          Supreme Court Cites Professor Rory Little

          Sample alt tag.
          Rory Little, Professor of Law.

          Justice Alito’s dissent today in Alleyne v. United States relies on a 2004 essay by Professor Rory Little.

          In Apprendi v. New Jersey (1996), the Supreme Court held that facts increasing a criminal defendant’s maximum possible sentence are elements of the criminal offense that must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. But in 2002, the Court decided in Harris v. United States that Apprendi did not apply to facts that would increase a defendant’s mandatory minimum sentence. Today’s decision overrules Harris and holds that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find all facts that fix the penalty range of a crime.

          In The Lost History of Apprendi and the Blakely Petition for Rehearing, Professor Little noted that Apprendi was based “on an erroneous historical un­derstanding of the Framers’ views in 1790 when they wrote the 6th Amendment’s jury-trial guarantee.” Relying on this piece in his dissent today, Justice Alito suggests that if the Court is of a mind to reconsider existing precedent, it should reconsider Apprendi.

          ###

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Friday, May 18, 2018

          UC Hastings Students Speak at UN Human Rights Council in Geneva

          Members of the Hastings Human Rights and International Law Organization attended the 37th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council to meet diplomats, engage in discussions on human rights issues, and deliver advocacy statements during proceedings.
          Wednesday, May 09, 2018

          Joseph W. Cotchett, Champion for Justice and Titan of the Plaintiffs Bar, is UC Hastings Law's 2018 Commencement Speaker

          Litigation Trial Lawyers Hall of Famer and UC Hastings Alumnus, Class of 1964, to keynote the College’s 137th Commencement
          Friday, May 04, 2018

          Blek le Rat, “The Godfather” of Stencil Graffiti, Contributes Installation at UC Hastings

          The innovative street artist is taking to the streets with works throughout San Francisco to promote a rare North American exhibition.
          Friday, May 04, 2018

          UC Hastings Professor Veena Dubal’s Work Plays Role in California Supreme Court Ruling

          “The Dynamex Decision” creates a major change in the landscape for California’s gig economy and follows the path of Professor Dubal’s analysis from her scholarly work.
          Wednesday, May 02, 2018

          Thinkers & Doers: April 2018

          Professor Dubal cited in the California Supreme Court’s Dynamex decision – Professor Aviram discusses “Sanctuary City” litigation outside the Ninth Circuit – Ellen DeGeneres asks Kamala Harris about 2020 presidential aspirations – How Asylum Works and Doesn’t Work – Professor Ball earns national recognition with 2018 Shanara Gilbert Award – Highlights from the Spring Soirée – and much more
          Go to News Archive