School Spirit

          Funky Chicken

          After 138 years of teaching law and producing first-class legal scholarship, we began to wonder if perhaps we are just a little too focused. Maybe we should look a little more like other institutions...

          Legally Speaking

          In conversation with UC Hastings Professor Joan C. Williams.

          UC Hastings Professor Joan Williams welcomes U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a conversation that touches on a broad range of subjects, from opera to marriage to work/life balance, doctrinal questions, and cases from the 1970's to present, including the court's role in establishing individual rights and equal protection. 

          UCHastings Spotlight

          The perfect opportunity.

          “I came to UC Hastings so I could learn to serve my community and the LfA Fellowship provided that learning opportunity for me--while also helping to fill the justice gap." Saron Tesfai '14 
          Wednesday, February 01, 2017

          Statement from Dean Faigman: Deans Letter to California Supreme Court re California Bar Exam

          Today a group of 20 deans of ABA-accredited California law schools submitted a letter to the California Supreme Court, calling upon it to “exercise its legal jurisdiction over the California State Bar to adjust its scoring methods to bring them in line with the nation’s at large.”

          Sample alt tag.
          "Suffice it to say that as dean of UC Hastings I will never stop fighting to ensure that our students succeed in their chosen profession." - Chancellor & Dean David Faigman

          Today a group of 20 deans of ABA-accredited California law schools submitted a letter to the California Supreme Court, calling upon it to “exercise its legal jurisdiction over the California State Bar to adjust its scoring methods to bring them in line with the nation’s at large.”

          Click here to read the letter Re: The California Bar Exam.

          As you know, from the day I started as Acting Dean in 2016, a principal concern of mine has been the UC Hastings bar passage rate. On this past July’s exam, UC Hastings performed horrifically, with a 51% pass rate – 11 percentage points below the rate for first-time ABA-accredited California law schools. This performance is, in a word, unacceptable. Changing it is on us, and the school is engaged in a multitude of efforts to turn this around. And we will do so!

          However, as I noted in my message after the 2016 results became public, the California State Bar’s historical practice of having, by far, the lowest pass rates in the nation has effectively tied a boulder to the ankles of those taking the California bar exam. Make no mistake about it, the California bar exam is not harder than any other state’s test. California simply sets its “cut score” – i.e., the minimum score set by each state that is required to pass the Multistate Bar Exam (MBE) portion of the bar exam – at an arbitrarily inflated level. California’s bar exam thus is not harder to take, just harder to pass. In fact, as the attached letter describes, California bar takers, and graduates of California law schools, do better on the MBE than the national average. Yet they do worse in terms of passing their own state’s bar exam.

          If California’s high cut score, and correspondingly low pass rate, protected the public from unqualified lawyers, it would be defensible. There is no evidence that it does so; and the California State Bar does not claim to have any evidence that it does so.

          But the arbitrarily high cut score impacts real lives in profoundly negative ways. Thousands of graduates, many of whom would have successfully passed other states’ exams, are forced to give up jobs, put off job opportunities, incur considerable debt, and suffer emotional and psychological harms as a result of the California Bar’s grading practices. As the State Bar itself recognizes, most of the 38% of those who failed the July 2016 exam will eventually pass on the second or third try. In the meantime, these candidates fall deeper into debt and further into despair. And for what? From the first administration to the second or third, when over 90% will likely pass, these takers do not learn to be better lawyers. They spend their time and money learning how to beat the test.

          The attached letter goes into greater detail than I can here. Suffice it to say that as dean of UC Hastings I will never stop fighting to ensure that our students succeed in their chosen profession. Although these efforts are not limited to the bar exam, that exam is a necessary prerequisite to every graduate’s professional success. First and foremost, this means working with our faculty to develop a curriculum that gives our students the best chance to perform well on the bar exam. This we will do. But my obligations do not end at the building’s doors. The attached letter is part of that effort.

          I look forward to working with you all to better serve our students and the legal profession.

          Sincerely,
          David

          ********
          David L. Faigman
          Chancellor and Dean
          John F. Digardi Distinguished Professor of Law
          University of California Hastings College of the Law
          200 McAllister Street
          San Francisco, CA 94102
          415-565-4739
          faigmand@uchastings.edu
          Professor, UCSF School of Medicine (Psychiatry)
          david.faigman@ucsf.edu

          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Thursday, December 14, 2017

          Associate Dean Lefstin & Other Leading Experts Conclude Current State of Patent Eligibility Jurisprudence “Indefensible”

          According to a report released by Lefstin, and two of the nation’s other leading patent law scholars, the current rules for determining what innovations are eligible for patent protection are indefensible as a matter of legal principle and are causing particular difficulties for bioscience fields.
          Monday, December 11, 2017

          Guaranteeing the Public Trust

          Julia Olson ’97 is spearheading a significant legal challenge to the United States government’s role in causing and increasing the dangers of climate change.
          Friday, December 01, 2017

          Thinkers & Doers: November 2017

          Auctions, Taxes, and Air – No more NDAs in felony sex claims – Why wasn’t Charles Manson executed? – Instacart’s “No Delivery Day” – How to Build a Disruptive Brand – Commentary on the ‘tragic’ and ‘bizarre’ Steinle case – and much more
          Friday, December 01, 2017

          Introducing Hastings Environmental Law Journal

          The Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy has changed its name to Hastings Environmental Law Journal (HELJ) and its inaugural issue is available now.
          Wednesday, November 22, 2017

          Interested in startup law and legal tech? New student org Tech x UCH has you covered.

          2Ls Xia Hwang and Edgar Vargas cofounded Tech x UCH to help educate fellow students about opportunities to learn about startup law at UC Hastings and bring panels of attorneys and early-stage startup founders to campus to discuss career opportunities.
          Go to News Archive