Fiat Justitia

          Justice is what you do.

          Why We Work For Justice
          The UC Hastings seal carries the words fiat justitia -- Let Justice Be Done. This motto is not a hollow promise; it is who we are and what we do.

          Legally Speaking

          In conversation with UC Hastings Professor Joan C. Williams.

          UC Hastings Professor Joan Williams welcomes U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for a conversation that touches on a broad range of subjects, from opera to marriage to work/life balance, doctrinal questions, and cases from the 1970's to present, including the court's role in establishing individual rights and equal protection. 
          Friday, September 29, 2017

          Introducing the Inaugural Issue of The Judges’ Book

          “The Judges’ Book is the first compendium of legal scholarship I have seen specifically selected for its usefulness by the judiciary. The project is an important and welcome one.” – From the Foreword by Judge Marsha S. Berzon, US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

          Sample alt tag.
          This inaugural issue of The Judges’ Book features excerpted scholarship from UC Hastings faculty members geared specifically toward judges, judicial business, and issues likely to come before courts for resolution.

          UC Hastings is pleased to announce the publication of the inaugural edition of The Judges’ Book, featuring excerpted scholarship from UC Hastings Faculty geared specifically towards judges, judicial business, and issues likely to come before courts for resolution. 

          Introduction, by Chancellor & Dean David Faigman 

          Welcome to The Judges’ Book.

          When we at UC Hastings produce the public good of legal scholarship, we seek to promote meaningful and enduring change. To do that, our best scholarship speaks to those on the front lines of the law: the members of the bench and bar. For it is in the courts that legal change can have immediate and direct impact on real people and litigants.

          This inaugural issue of The Judges’ Book features excerpted scholarship from UC Hastings faculty members geared specifically toward judges, judicial business, and issues likely to come before courts for resolution.

          We at UC Hastings take special pride in having produced scholarship that judges find useful in fulfilling their demanding role. We endeavor to continue to build on this reputation for producing works of scholarly excellence that have practical benefit.

          Key summaries in this volume feature the certification of class actions, the division of responsibility between judge and jury for expert evidence, the application of diversity jurisdiction in multiparty civil litigation, and the judicial enforceability of executive inaction, among many others.

          An appendix lists our faculty’s major works from 2016, including treatises such as the seminal Wright & Miller’s Federal Practice and Procedure, amicus briefs filed in federal court, and leadership roles in judicial conferences.

          The essence of the mission of legal education—from students to the bench and bar—is thought leadership in the law. We at UC Hastings strive to take the next step of turning that leadership into practical results. The Judges’ Book is part of that step. I hope you enjoy it.

          Foreword, by The Honorable Marsha S. Berzon

          The Judges’ Book is the first compendium of legal scholarship I have seen specifically selected for its usefulness by the judiciary. The
          project is an important and welcome one.

          Increasingly in recent years, it has become commonplace for judges to complain that the articles published in law reviews are abstract, abstruse, and self-absorbed. They often consist of dialogues among academics, not conversations meant to include the rest of the legal community—lawyers, judges, and policy makers, for example. 

          I have encountered the problem most directly when I have a novel legal issue about which there is little judicial precedent. I
          sometimes ask my law clerks to gather what I call secondary literature on the question, meaning articles and books by legal scholars. The quest is rarely successful. The available material is offpitch, one might say—it is either too theoretical and does not directly do business with the case law and statutory or constitutional language, or it consists of law student notes, which usually just tell me and my clerks what we have already figured out.

          The articles in The Judges’ Book do not have this pitch problem—they are pitched just right. I expect the Book will therefore be useful to my colleagues on the bench, and I look forward to future editions.

          Read The Judges' Book

          Access The Judges' Book online at 


          Go to News Archive

          Share this Story

          Share via Facebook
          Share via TwitterShare via EmailPrint Friendly Version

          Other Recent Stories/ RSS

          Thursday, December 14, 2017

          Associate Dean Lefstin & Other Leading Experts Conclude Current State of Patent Eligibility Jurisprudence “Indefensible”

          According to a report released by Lefstin, and two of the nation’s other leading patent law scholars, the current rules for determining what innovations are eligible for patent protection are indefensible as a matter of legal principle and are causing particular difficulties for bioscience fields.
          Monday, December 11, 2017

          Guaranteeing the Public Trust

          Julia Olson ’97 is spearheading a significant legal challenge to the United States government’s role in causing and increasing the dangers of climate change.
          Friday, December 01, 2017

          Thinkers & Doers: November 2017

          Auctions, Taxes, and Air – No more NDAs in felony sex claims – Why wasn’t Charles Manson executed? – Instacart’s “No Delivery Day” – How to Build a Disruptive Brand – Commentary on the ‘tragic’ and ‘bizarre’ Steinle case – and much more
          Friday, December 01, 2017

          Introducing Hastings Environmental Law Journal

          The Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy has changed its name to Hastings Environmental Law Journal (HELJ) and its inaugural issue is available now.
          Wednesday, November 22, 2017

          Interested in startup law and legal tech? New student org Tech x UCH has you covered.

          2Ls Xia Hwang and Edgar Vargas cofounded Tech x UCH to help educate fellow students about opportunities to learn about startup law at UC Hastings and bring panels of attorneys and early-stage startup founders to campus to discuss career opportunities.
          Go to News Archive